VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP)
CCTA #0004: Novel Therapeutics in PTSD: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Mifepristone
Investigator Access |
|
What's Available |
Check with study contact or publications for information on a public dataset, data archive, data enclave, or website where data might be available. |
Available Documentation |
|
Dates Data are Available |
|
Access Criteria |
Investigators associated with VA or non-VA nonprofit, academic, or research institutions may submit a Research Resource Request form to Tom.Sindowski@va.gov. Investigators may be asked to provide further documentation such as a study proposal. All requests are reviewed for scientific and ethical merit. Access is contingent upon approval by the requestor’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and, if applicable, a VA Research and Development (R&D) Committee. To gain access, requestors must sign a VA data use agreement. Requestors must be fully compliant with VA data security, privacy, and human subjects requirements. |
Study Characteristics |
|
Objectives |
To test an innovated treatment approach in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) – pharmacological manipulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the body’s major stress system, with mifepristone |
Era of Service |
All |
Population |
Male Veterans who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. (DMS-IV) criteria for PTSD, have a CAPS total score ≥50 at screening, on a stable dose of psychotropic medication for at least five weeks prior to screening (if taking) or minimum of five half-lives that elapsed prior to screening since last time of taking psychotropic medication (if not taking) |
Study Design |
Randomized, double-blinded, two-arm, parallel assignment clinical trial |
Interventions |
|
Time Period |
November 2012 - November 2016 |
Setting |
National |
N |
81 (41 participants taking mifepristone, 40 participants taking placebo) |
Response Rate |
Unconfirmed |
Recruitment Method |
Participants were recruited through direct contact and provider referral. Contact methods approved by governing IRB included phone and letter with pre-established oral and written scripts. Patients agreeing to be evaluated had initial visit with the study team that again ensured inclusion and exclusion criteria are met. Participants are then asked to sign a written consent. |
Compensation |
|
Data Collected |
Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
Other assessments
|
Data Collection Methods |
|
Funding Sources |
|
Investigators |
Julia A Golier, MD |
Contact |
|
Selected Publications |
Check with study contact |
More Information |
|